Tuesday, November 26, 2013

Fatherhood

   When my son looks into me with those eyes, those chinky eyes as my not so P.C. grandmother calls them. They are chinky due to our Native American (damn dirty Choctaw) heritage, I see myself, my brother, mother, grandmother, great grandfather, and so on, and so on; as far back as there have been a people. Warriors, kings, peasants, and outlaws. On and on they go, my blood, my family’s blood, it stretches on through eons, through eternity, looking as far back as fathomable, and then some.
    One look, that is all it takes, he looks at me and I am bonded to him and to those before me, it is like lightening. Nay, more like roots boring down every time our gaze meets. Back to Doggardland, back to the first men, the caves; back to Eden. Spear points, swords, guns, universities, cathedrals, and all the ruins we will leave behind. Can you imagine every existential conundrum you ever had solved with one look? I can. Love/children are like a candle.


“Thousands of candles can be lit from a single candle, and the life of the candle will not be shortened. Happiness never decreases by being shared.”
― Gautama Buddha



   Every time my child touches me, his little hands on my face, his little fingers wrapped around my little finger, there is a cellular connection that cannot quite be put into words. It is a flash into the future.
 Every single generation before me, 2 parents, 4 grandparents, 8 great grandparents, 16 g,great grandparents, 32 g,g,great grandparents, and so forth and so on have come together, accumulated, and working in concert to create the perfect being before me. Ten little fingers, ten little toes curl to my touch. If I am blessed he will have 2 children; I will have 2 grandchildren, 4 great grand children, 8 g,g,grandchildren and so on and so forth. Stretching out into eternity; forever and forever until the stars birth new ones.
      With one touch my future is laid out before me, and my restless soul is at ease. My eyes are like his because I am a mere vessel passing a legacy that he will step into. Can you imagine the sheer weight of such a gift? If you cannot you should take the time to meditate on it, because regardless of if you can, you carry it. 

Monday, October 8, 2012

Order of St. Joachim, "Self-Styled" or "Confraternal?"






The Order of St. Joachim: A Confraternal Order of Chivalry.
By: Nathan M. Glover
10-08-2012

           It has been said by so-called heraldic experts that the Order of St. Joachim (hereafter the OSJ), is a “self-styled” order of chivalry. The evidence of this they claim is that the OSJ lacks a proper “Fons Honorum.” A Fons Honorum, is a person or government which is a sovereign (A Prince, Duke, Head of State etc.), whom has lawfully established an Order of Knighthood. A “Self-Styled” order is one in which no valid “Fons” can be produced. I would like to counter these claims, and provide evidence that the OSJ is indeed what is known as a “Confraternal Order of Chivalry,” and is most certainly not “Self Styled.” First, let’s look at the claims made against the OSJ, that it is “Self-Styled, “from Guy Stair Sainty. Below I will rebut his claims, bit-by-bit:
          The Order of Saint Joachim, is a modern "revival" of an Order whose legitimacy was in question from its foundation. Promoted by a British writer on Orders (1802), who claimed that Admiral Lord Nelson had accepted the "Grand Magistery" - the Admiral being Britain's greatest hero at the time - but there is no historical evidence that Lord Nelson ever took up these duties. The Order ceased to function early in the 19th century. The present "Order" has been revived under the "Grand Magistery" of a certain Helmut von Braundle-Falkensee (this family is not included in the Genealogische Handbuch der Adeligen Häuser, the principal reference source on German noble houses).[11] This appears to be a body genuinely dedicated to charitable works, and the small sum required for membership (£15 sterling) is so modest that no-one could be fooled into believing this was any more than a charitable association which has assumed the guise of an order, rather than a body which seriously pretends to be an Order of Knighthood in order to defraud.”

The first claim Mr. Sainty makes, is: “Promoted by a British writer on Orders (1802), who claimed that Admiral Lord Nelson had accepted the "Grand Magistery" - the Admiral being Britain's greatest hero at the time - but there is no historical evidence that Lord Nelson ever took up these duties.”

This argument is somewhat of a red herring. For starters, Lord Nelson was never made “Grand Master of the Order, as is so stated in the quotation above.” He was simply given the honorific rank of “Knight Grand Commander” and never had any administrative duties or otherwise in the OSJ. Hence, why there is no “historical evidence” supporting that he was ever the Grand Master, because necessarily there wouldn’t be any would there?

A second claim: “The Order ceased to function early in the 19th century. The present "Order" has been revived under the "Grand Magistery" of a certain Helmut von Braundle-Falkensee (this family is not included in the Genealogische Handbuch der Adeligen Häuser, the principal reference source on German noble houses.”

          While the OSJ was “re-organized,” it never ceased to function. Whether or not the “Helmut von Braundle-Falkensee” family were nobility or not is immaterial, as this is not needed in a Confraternal Order of Chivalry as the “Grand Magistery” is an elected position.

The third and final claim of Mr. Sainty: “This appears to be a body genuinely dedicated to charitable works, and the small sum required for membership (£15 sterling) is so modest that no-one could be fooled into believing this was any more than a charitable association which has assumed the guise of an order, rather than a body which seriously pretends to be an Order of Knighthood in order to defraud.”
           
No, the OSJ does not “pretend to be an Order of Knighthood,” nor an “Order of Knighthood in order to defraud.” It is an Order of Knighthood, and the only pretending going on, is that it’s not, by some “Historians” with questionable agendas at best, and malicious intent at worst. Francis Townsend, the “Pursuivant of Arms,” of the English College of Arms had the following to say about the OSJ:




          So, let’s take a look at the founders of the OSJ, and see if we can determine what sort of Chivalric Order that it is. This is an excerpt from the official OSJ website:
         
The Equestrian, Secular and Chapterial Order of Saint Joachim was established on the 20th of June, 1755 by fourteen nobles and distinguished military leaders of the Holy Roman Empire. Having seen the terrible consequences of ongoing religious wars in Europe, our founders dedicated themselves to "worship the Supreme Being, show tolerance towards all religions, loyalty towards their princes, support the needs of their military, the poor, widows and orphans." The Order was uniquely composed of both Protestant and Catholic nobles and leaders at a time when religion violently divided Europe and the German states within the Holy Roman Empire, and other knightly orders allied themselves exclusively with one faith or the other. The Order was headed by His Serene Highness Prince Christian Franz von Sachsen-Coburg Saalfeld, son of reigning Duke Franz Josias. Prince Christian Franz was installed as our first Grand Master on June 20th, 1756, a position he held until 1773. In addition to Prince Christian Franz, the other founding members of the Order in 1755 were:


·        Duke Karl Friedrich of Württemberg-Oels

·        Prince Piccolomini

·        Count Josef von Clary und Aldringen

·        Baron Friedrich Karl von Eib

·        Ritter Michel Fachner von Trauenstein

·        Keck von Schwarzbach

·        Count Procop von Kollowrat-Krakowsky

·        Baron Johann Philip Schutzbar von Milchling

·        Baron Moser von Filseck

·        Count Johann Wilhelm von Nostitz

·        Baron Anselm Josef Reichlin von Meldegg

·        Johann Josef Wiedersperger von Wiedersperg

·        Baron Friedrich von Zobel von Giebelstadt”
         (2011, the Order of Saint Joachim)


This excerpt from the official website of the OSJ makes it clear that the founding head of the Order in 1755 was not a sovereign. Yes, he was a Prince, but it were his Father whom was a reigning Duke, and hence, a sovereign. Even though the next few Grand Masters of the Order would most certainly qualify as a “Fons Honorum,” the position of Grand Master was an elected position due to the Order being Confraternal, and not based upon familial bloodlines, or other titles of nobility. So what is a “Confraternal Order of Chivalry?” According to Jonathan Dacre Boulton D’Arcy, a Confraternal Order is: “A class made up by those orders which took the form of a devotional confraternity but, unlike the monarchical orders, were endowed with a formally democratic constitution under which the chief office was elective rather than hereditary.” (1987, 2000, D’A.J.D. Boulton)


This precisely describes the Order of St. Joachim. As we can clearly see, the OSJ is a legitimate confraternal order of chivalry, based upon the definitions of such. We can speculate as to why there have been those whom have slandered the order, or claimed it was “self-styled.” Could it be because of the ecumenical nature of the Order? Could it be that they are opposed to religious tolerance, and forging relationships between religions? Could it be that they do not like that there are no religious requirements to join the order, and feel that Christianity, and more precisely Roman Catholicism has a monopoly over Chivalry? I think perhaps more light may be shed by viewing the order’s foundation with the understanding that it’s stated raison d’être was highly unconventional and even radical at the time it was created. Making it more radical, were some of the early members of the order, which had known memberships in the Freemasons, the Perfectibilists (Adam Weishaupt’s Bavarian Illuminati), and the Rosicrucians. These individuals founding this order in those times of radical upheaval would certainly have not garnered the generosity of other more conventional (Catholic) orders of Chivalry. I think perhaps viewed through this lens, it can possibly be seen why the order has historically had detractors!

In summary, I treasure my membership in the Order of St. Joachim. I strongly believe in its stated principals of religious tolerance, and brotherhood. It is an honor to belong to such an August company of men such as Lord Horatio Nelson. The order’s obscure historical connections with secret societies, and political intrigue, make it a very interesting order to research and belong to. For my next paper on the Order of St. Joachim, I will go into more detail of the order’s connections with the Freemasons, The Illuminati, and the Rosicrucians.

Respectfully,

Nathan M. Glover

          Mr. Glover is a Knight Expectant in the Order of St. Joachim. He is also a Master Mason in Mcmillan Lodge # 141, AF&AM, Grand Lodge of Ohio, Affiliate of King Solomon Lodge # 8, PHA Kentucky Inc., and a Knights Templar in Webb Commandery # 1, Lexington York Rite Bodies. Mr. Glover is an avid historian, fraternal enthusiast, and mystic. He also currently serves the citizens of the United States, as a Federal Police Officer, and was Honorably Discharged from the Army, where he served as a Combat Engineer in the 82nd Airborne Division. Mr. Glover is the proud father of three beautiful children, and a beautiful wife whom is originally from Lagos, Nigeria.



References:
Sainty, G.S. (N.D.). Almanach De La Cour: Confraternal Orders of Chivalry. Retrieved from website: http://www.chivalricorders.org/orders/self-styled/slfstlod.htm
N.A. (2005-2012). The Order of St. Joachim. Retrieved from website: http://www.stjoachimorder.org/

Tuesday, October 2, 2012

Honorary Colonel



An honorary commission or a regular military commission is the American equivalent of being knighted, The honorary title of Colonel is conferred by some states in the United States of America and certain military units of the Commonwealth. The origins of the titular colonelcy can be traced back to colonial and antebellum times when men of the landed gentry were given the title for financing the local militia without actual expectations of command. This practice can actually be traced back to the English Renaissance when a colonelcy was purchased by a lord or prominent gentleman but the actual command would fall to a lieutenant colonel, who would deputize for the proprietor.
link to source

There is an aristocratic tinge to the social usage of the title “colonel", which today designates the southern gentleman, and is archetypal of the southern aristocrat. States conferring this title as an honor include Kentucky, Tennessee, Mississippi, South Carolina, Georgia, Oklahoma, Louisiana, New Mexico, North Dakota, and Alabama. In 2005 Illinois allowed for the Governor of the State to make appointments to the Governor's Regiment of Colonels, but no such appointments have been made. Many states have provisions in their articles or bills concerning state defense forces which allow the governor to grant honorary membership of the officer ranks. While the honorary colonel of this usage has no actual military role, the title did evolve from the military.

The highest honor of Tennessee is “Colonel, Aide de camp, Governor’s staff". Those who receive this award are recorded by the Secretary of State of Tennessee with those who have been commissioned into the State Guard and Tennessee National Guard. This distinction went to only American citizens or Tennessee residents until Governor Phil Bredesen awarded it to the first non-American, a Canadian, Cory Ward Dingle of British Columbia for his contributions to the People of Tennessee.

Kentucky’s famous colonelcy evolved from the personal bodyguards of the governor and now confers its recipients as honorary members of the governor’s staff. Like Tennessee, Georgia’s honorary titles give its members a rank as Aides-de-camp to the Governor's staff and is codified in the Official Code of Georgia Annotated 38-2-111, while the Alabama honor specifically makes one a lieutenant colonel in the state militia.

The Colonel is also often a shorthand reference to Colonel Sanders, the founder of KFC, who was an honorary Kentucky colonel. Another famous "colonel" was "Colonel Tom Parker", the manager of Elvis Presley whose title was granted by Jimmie Davis, the governor of Louisiana



Oklahoma Honorary Colonel


§446. Honorary staff of the Governor.


The Governor may appoint an honorary staff to consist of such number of honorary aides with the brevet title of Colonel, Lieutenant Colonel or Major, as he may desire. All of these staff officers shall be appointed by the Governor and hold office at his will and their commissions shall expire with the term of office of the Governor making such appointment. Staff officers shall not be subject to jury duty during the period of their service. The Adjutant General shall be ex officio Chief of Staff.


Laws 1951, p. 114, art. 1, § 7, eff. May 16, 1951.

Link to source
Oklahoma Sate Militia
Choctaw Governor Victor M. Locke and Oklahoma state militia officers, Oklahoma, 1910? – 1918?
Image courtesy Marquette University Archives, 11499

§4441. Composition of Militia Classes.
The Militia of the State of Oklahoma shall consist of all able bodied citizens of the United States and all other able bodied persons who shall be or shall have declared their intentions to become citizens of the United States, who shall be more than seventeen (17) years of age and not more than seventy (70) years of age, and said militia shall be divided into three (3) classes: The National Guard, the Oklahoma State Guard, and the Unorganized Militia.

Laws 1951, p. 115, art. 3, § 1, eff. May 16, 1951; Laws 1957, p. 422, § 1, eff. May 24, 1957; Laws 1968, c. 299, § 1, emerg. eff. May 3, 1968; Laws 1981, c. 136, § 1; Laws 1985, c. 96, § 1, eff. Nov. 1, 1985.

Monday, September 10, 2012

The American Legion of Merit

link to source
Executive Order 9260--Legion of Merit
Source: The provisions of Executive Order 9260 of Oct. 29, 1942, appear at 7 FR 8819, 3 CFR, 1943-1948 Comp., p. 1222, unless otherwise noted.
1. The decoration of the Legion of Merit shall be awarded by the President of the United States or at his direction to members of the armed forces of the United States and members of the armed forces of friendly foreign nations, who, after the proclamation of an emergency by the President on September 8, 1939, shall have distinguished themselves by exceptionally meritorious conduct in the performance of outstanding services.
2. Awards of the decoration of the Legion of Merit may be proposed to the President by the Secretary of the Army, the Secretary of the Navy, and the Secretary of the Air Force, each acting upon the recommendation of an officer of the armed forces of the United States who has personal knowledge of the services of the person recommended.
3 (a). The decoration of the Legion of Merit, in the degrees of Commander, Officer, and Legionnaire, shall be awarded by the Secretary of Defense or his designee, after concurrence by the Secretary of State, to members of the armed forces of friendly foreign nations.
(b). Recommendations for awards of the Legion of Merit, in the degree of Chief Commander, to members of the armed forces of friendly foreign nations shall be submitted by the Secretary of Defense, after concurrence by the Secretary of State, to the President for his approval.

[EO 9260 amended by EO 10600 of Mar. 15, 1955, 20 FR 1569, 3 CFR, 1954-1958 Comp., p. 245]

Sunday, September 9, 2012

Sign of the Times


These are terrifying times, as our world gets bigger, and our society becomes more complex, it is only the natural progression of things that our tragedies, our violence, fear and hatred for one another follows suit.
You must be the sane in an insane world; you must be the just for the unjust. The bureaucrats have proven time and time again that they cannot protect you, and that they cannot protect your kith or kindred, in fact we have set up a system that is doing more harm than good through its misguided application of force, or by its negligence.
Buy a gun, each and everyone you, be the arm of righteousness. Live with chivalry and be the shining example of integrity.  Be a light in the world with your spirituality. Be an alpha.
At this moment, no matter your gender, your race, or any other circumstance of your birth, you are having greatness forced upon you; the question is what will you do with it?

Defend the meek, deliver the wicked

Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Upholding the Code of Chivalry















The code of chivalry must be adopted and applied, if one is not a Christian big deal, modify it. If one is a lady and feels that it does not apply to her, then realize that the gender roles have changed and apply it anyway.  The most standardized/popular version is Charlemagne's Code of Chivalry from The Song of Roland (1098-1100 A.D.) Link to source

1)       To fear God and maintain His Church
        a.       This could be modified for one’s different faith or deist/agnostic perspective
2)      To serve the liege lord in valor and faith
        a.       This scholar personally equates this to patriotism
3)      To protect the weak and defenseless
4)      To give succor to widows and orphans
5)      To refrain from the wanton giving of offence
6)      To live by honor and for glory
7)      To despise pecuniary reward
       a.      (A wonderfulexplanation here)
8)      To fight for the welfare of all
9)      To obey those placed in authority
       a.       With exceptions of tyranny
10)  To guard the honor of fellow knights
       a.       One’s kith and kindred
11)  To eschew unfairness, meanness and deceit
12)  To keep faith
13)  At all times to speak the truth
14)  To persevere to the end in any enterprise begun
15)  To respect the honor of women
16)  Never to refuse a challenge from an equal
17)  Never to turn the back upon a foe

The 14th Century Duke of Burgundy added chivalric virtues to the code:

1)    Faith
2)    Charity
3)    Justice
4)    Sagacity
5)    Prudence
6)    Temperance
7)    Resolution
8)    Truth
9)    Liberality
10)  Diligence
11)  Hope
12)  Valor

Tenets of Bushidō
Nitobe was not the first person to document Japanese chivalry in this way. In his text Feudal and Modern Japan (1896), historian Arthur May Knapp wrote:
“The samurai of thirty years ago had behind him a thousand years of training in the law of honor, obedience, duty, and self-sacrifice.... It was not needed to create or establish them. As a child he had but to be instructed, as indeed he was from his earliest years, in the etiquette of self-immolation. The fine instinct of honor demanding it was in the very blood....”

martial arts, and honor to the death. Under the bushidō ideal, if a samurai failed to uphold his honor he could only regain it by performing seppuku (ritual suicide).

Bushidō expanded and formalized the earlier code of the samurai, and stressed frugality, loyalty, mastery of
In an excerpt from his book Samurai: The World of the Warrior,[25] historian Stephen Turnbull describes the role of seppuku in feudal Japan:
In the world of the warrior, seppuku was a deed of bravery that was admirable in a samurai who knew he was defeated, disgraced, or mortally wounded. It meant that he could end his days with his transgressions wiped away and with his reputation not merely intact but actually enhanced. The cutting of the abdomen released the samurai’s spirit in the most dramatic fashion, but it was an extremely painful and unpleasant way to die, and sometimes the samurai who was performing the act asked a loyal comrade to cut off his head at the moment of agony.
Bushidō was widely practiced, varying little over time, and across the geographic and socio-economic backgrounds of the samurai, who at one time represented up to 10% of the Japanese population. The first Meiji era census at the end of the 19th century counted 1,282,000 members of the "high samurai", allowed to ride a horse, and 492,000 members of the "low samurai", allowed to wear two swords but not to ride a horse, in a country of about 25 million.
Bushidō includes compassion for those of lower station, and for the preservation of one's name. Early bushidō literature further enforces the requirement to conduct oneself with calmness, fairness, justice, and propriety. The relationship between learning and the way of the warrior is clearly articulated, one being a natural partner to the other.
Other parts of the bushidō philosophy cover methods of raising children, appearance, and grooming, but all of this may be seen as part of one's constant preparation for death — to die a good death with one's honor intact, the ultimate aim in a life lived according to bushidō. Indeed, a "good death" is its own reward, and by no means assurance of "future rewards" in the afterlife. Notable samurai, though certainly not all (e.g. Amakusa Shiro), have throughout history held such aims or beliefs in disdain, or expressed the awareness that their station — as it involves killing — precludes such reward, especially in Buddhism. On the contrary, the soul of a noble warrior suffering in hell or as a lingering spirit is a common motif in Japanese art and literature. Bushidō, while exhibiting the influence of Dao through Zen Buddhism, is a philosophy in contradistinction to religious belief, with a deep commitment to propriety in this world for propriety's sake.
Seven virtues of Bushidō
  1. Courage (勇氣, yūki?)
  2. Respect (, rei?)
  3. Honesty (, makoto?)
  4. Honour (名誉, meiyo?)
  5. Loyalty (忠義, chūgi?)
Associated virtues
  1. Wisdom (, chi?)


For further information with the Art of Manliness




"Native American cultures have held a warrior code of honor so similar to bushido that they many have simply adopted it while amalgamating it with their cultural interpretations.

Here is an excerpt from Redhawk of the Kainaiwa Clan of the Blackfoot People.



"We have this built in code in our DNA that speaks to us of right and wrong. Our duty to ourselves is to reach inside and interpret this code when we are faced with hard decisions about what to do in difficult situations.

Today we have a tough time finding this code in the face of so many contradictions in society. However the Way of the Warrior is as valid today as it was 10,000 years ago when we evolved into reasoning beings.

What I have done is to set these out in 7 different Codes that can be easily printed and posted to your hallway mirror as the last thing you look at before you exit your home into this alien world where evil waits to distract.

In truth these codes are the same as those taught by the BUSHIDO masters in the Far East and are as valid here in the West as they are anywhere! These are the codes lived by every Native American who has been raised in the traditions of our Elders since time began on this continent. It is indeed strange how these rules of Creator can be felt even in the remotest depths of every land where Honor lives."